nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 04, v.39 12-19
不同品种鲜食玉米食用品质与理化、质构特性的相关性研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金-联合基金项目(U23A20257)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

为明确不同品种鲜食玉米食用品质与理化特性的关联性,对比分析甜玉米、甜糯玉米和糯玉米3种类型共12个品种的感官评分、基本成分及质构特性。结果表明:甜玉米与甜糯玉米的感官评分高于糯玉米。水分含量和可溶性糖含量排序为甜玉米>甜糯玉米>糯玉米;总淀粉含量排序为糯玉米>甜糯玉米>甜玉米,甜糯玉米和糯玉米淀粉中支链淀粉含量在96%以上,而甜玉米支链淀粉含量为64%~67%。甜玉米的脂肪含量显著高于甜糯玉米和糯玉米。感官评分与水分和可溶性糖含量呈显著正相关,与总淀粉含量和质构特性指标呈负相关,甜玉米和甜糯玉米在感官评分上优于糯玉米,主要归因于其更高的水分和可溶性糖含量。质构特性受水分含量、可溶性糖含量和总淀粉含量协同调控。

Abstract:

To clarify the correlation between the edible quality and physicochemical properties of different varieties of fresh corn, a comparative analysis was conducted on the sensory scores, basic components and texture characteristics of 12 varieties of three types of corn: sweet corn, sweet-waxy corn, and waxy corn. The results showed that the sensory scores of sweet corn and sweet-waxy corn were higher than waxy corn. Moisture and soluble sugar contents followed the order: sweet corn>sweet-waxy corn>waxy corn. The total starch content was ranked as follows: waxy corn>sweet-waxy corn>sweet corn. The content of amylopectin of sweet-waxy corn and waxy corn was over 96 %, while the content of amylopectin in sweet corn was 64 %-67 %. The fat content of sweet corn was significantly higher than that in sweet-waxy corn and waxy corn. Sensory scores showed a significant positive correlation with moisture and soluble sugar content, and negative correlation with total starch and texture characteristic. Sweet corn and sweet-waxy corn had better sensory scores than waxy corn, mainly due to their higher moisture and soluble sugar content. The texture characteristics were synergistically regulated by moisture, soluble sugar, and starch content.

参考文献

[1]安林,程乙,罗上轲,等.鲜食糯玉米营养品质及其影响因素研究进展[J].山地农业生物学报,2023,42(5):40-45.

[2]王浩,刘景圣,郑明珠,等.鲜食糯玉米贮藏过程中淀粉含量及相关酶活性变化的研究[J].中国粮油学报,2017,32(3):6-10,24.

[3]党冬冬.鲜食玉米籽粒矿质元素含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因挖掘[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2024.

[4]HU X D,LIU H Y,YU Y T,et al.Accumulation of phenolics,antioxidant and antiproliferative activity of sweet corn (Zea maysL.) during kernel maturation[J].International Journal of Food Science and Technology,2021,56(5):2462-2470.

[5]HARAKOTR B,SURIHARN B,TANGWONGCHAI R,et al.Anthocyanins and antioxidant activity in coloured waxy corn at different maturation stages[J].Journal of Functional Foods,2014,9:109-118.

[6]SIMLA S,BOONTANG S,HARAKOTR B.Anthocyanin content,total phenolic content,and antiradical capacity in different ear components of purple waxy corn at two maturation stages[J].Australian Journal of Crop Science,2016,10(5):675-682.

[7]ZHAO Q Y,XI J Z,FENG T T,et al.A comparative study on the physicochemical properties,texture characteristics,mineral element profile,and volatile compounds of selected soft and non-soft Japonica rice varieties[J].Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,2025,144:107687.

[8]毛红艳,王佳敏,祖力皮牙·买买提,等.不同蒸煮时间黑甜鲜食玉米质构特性及挥发性成分分析[J/OL].食品工业科技(2025-03-25)[2025-08-13].https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024100348.

[9]蒋皖倩,房浩,徐运林,等.不同甜玉米品系籽粒的感官品质及主要TPA特性[J].江汉大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(2):90-96.

[10]潘阳,曹川.不同干燥方式对鲜食甜玉米粒品质的影响[J].安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版),2023,46(6):550-554.

[11]王綦,程力,洪雁,等.鲜食糯玉米食用品质与淀粉性质的相关性研究[J].食品与生物技术学报,2023,42(12):43-52.

[12]王春芳,柳洪入,刘晨霞,等.基于主成分和聚类分析的不同品种鲜食甜玉米营养品质评价[J].农产品加工,2025(10):54-59.

[13]周新原,陈少青,马丽丽,等.不同贮藏温度对甜糯玉米贮藏品质的影响[J].玉米科学,2024,32(9):49-58.

[14]王綦.鲜食糯玉米食用品质评价及影响机制研究[D].无锡:江南大学,2022.

[15]修琳,刘景圣,蔡丹,等.鲜玉米中可溶性糖含量的测定[J].食品科学,2011,32(4):174-176.

[16]曹庆军,姜晓莉,杨粉团,等.种植密度对甜玉米与鲜食糯玉米产量与品质性状的影响[J].玉米科学,2018,26(6):94-98.

[17]HU Y,COLANTONIO V,MÜLLER B S F,et al.Genome assembly and population genomic analysis provide insights into the evolution of modern sweet corn[J].Nature Communications,2021,12:1227.

[18]AL-ASHKAR I,ROMDHANE W B,EL-SAID R A,et al.Agro-physiologic responses and stress-related gene expression of four doubled haploid wheat lines under salinity stress conditions[J].Biology,2021,10(1):56.

[19]李余良,索海翠.鲜食玉米胚乳突变基因及其分子育种研究进展[J].中国农学通报.2019,35(19):21-27.

[20]ZHENG B,GUO X B,TANG Y K,et al.Development changes in multi-scale structure and functional properties of waxy corn starch at different stages of kernel growth[J].International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2021,191:335-343.

[21]李一男.利用甜糯双隐(三隐)性基因材料选育甜加糯玉米品种[J].农业开发与装备,2015(8):26,38.

[22]LONGTON J,LEGRYS G A.Differential scanning calorimetry studies on the crystallinity of aging wheat starch gels[J].Starch,1981,33(12):410-414.

[23]WANG B,DONG Y Q,FANG Y X,et al.Effects of different moisture contents on the structure and properties of corn starch during extrusion[J].Food Chemistry,2022,368:130804.

[24]熊柳,张兆丽,连彩霞,等.食品中RS3含量与凝胶性的关系[J].食品工业科技,2009,30 (9):133-135,138.

[25]娄海伟,王媛,赵仁勇.糯玉米淀粉的理化性质及其在食品中的应用研究进展[J].河南工业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,44(3):120-128.

[26]轩瑞瑞,陈艳萍,刘春菊,等.基于熵权法和灰色关联度法的鲜食糯玉米品质评价[J].食品工业科技,2021,42(14):241-248.

[27]董宗宗,乔勇进,刘晨霞,等.不同采收期对鲜食糯玉米品质影响的研究[J].上海农业学报,2020,36(4):19-24.

基本信息:

中图分类号:TS213.4

引用信息:

[1]赵福银,陈佳龙,代佳音,等.不同品种鲜食玉米食用品质与理化、质构特性的相关性研究[J].粮食与油脂,2026,39(04):12-19.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金-联合基金项目(U23A20257)

投稿时间:

2025-07-30

投稿日期(年):

2025

终审时间:

2026-03-04

终审日期(年):

2026

修回时间:

2026-03-07

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2026-04-10

出版时间:

2026-04-10

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文